LESLIE V. COMMISSIONER
539 F.2d 943 (3rd Cir. 1976)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a sale and lease back transaction.
Commissioner (D) challenged a decision of the Tax Court which held that Leslie (P) could
claim a loss where the fee conveyance part of the transaction was a sale that can be
classified as a like in kind exchange.
FACTS: P was a manufacturing company engaged in the manufacture and distribution of
pressure and temperature regulators and water heaters. P needed a new facility and purchased
land in 1976 but did not have the money to construct a new plant at that location. P then
entered into a deal with Prudential Life Insurance upon which P would build the plant and
Prudential would then purchase the plant from P at $2,400,000 or the actual cost to P
whichever was less and Prudential would then lease the facility back to P for 30 years with
repurchase options every five years. The total cost of construction was $3,187,414 and P
then conveyed the building to Prudential and executed the 30-year lease. P then deducted
from its 1968 tax return the monies it lost on the transaction; $787,414. The IRS disallowed
the deduction; this was a like in kind exchange and thus there was no loss or gain. The Tax
Court found that the transaction was a sale because the leasehold had no separate capital
value (the lease was at market rates so there was no value or advantage with respect to the
lease) which could properly be viewed as part of the consideration paid; thus P got
$2,400,000 in monies for the sale of the building and there was no like in kind exchange.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment