LITTLE V. LITTLE
975 P.2d 108 (1999)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Billy Little (H) sought review of a decision from the Court of
Appeals reversing the judgment of the trial court that denied H's petition to modify his
child support obligation.
FACTS: H and W divorced and the court ordered H, an Air Force lieutenant, to pay $1,186
per month for the support of his two young children. In August 1996, H resigned his
commission in the Air Force, a position that paid $48,000 in yearly salary plus benefits,
and chose to enroll as a full-time student at Arizona State University College of Law rather
than to seek employment. H petitioned the court to reduce his child support obligation to
$239 per month. The trial court concluded that H had failed to prove a substantial and
continuing change of circumstances. The trial court specifically found that appellant
voluntarily left his employment to further his own ambition; that he failed to consider the
needs of his children when he made that decision; and that to reduce his child support
obligation would be to his children's immediate detriment and their previously established
needs. The trial court did reduce appellant's child support obligation to $972 per month on
the ground that W had acquired a higher paying job. H appealed. The court of appeals,
applying a good faith test to determine whether H acted reasonably in voluntarily leaving
his employment, held that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that H's decision
to terminate his employment and pursue a law degree was unreasonable. W appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment