MAHONEY V. TINGLEY
529 P.2d 1068 (1975)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Tingley (D) sought review of the decision that reversed the trial
court's grant of summary judgment to D, in P's action for damages for breach of an earnest
money agreement.
FACTS: P and D entered into an earnest money agreement where P agreed to sell residential
property to D. The price was eventually reduced to $20,250. D deposited $200 as earnest
money. The agreement contained the following clause: If title is so insurable and purchaser
fails or refuses to complete purchase, the earnest money shall be forfeited as liquidated
damages unless seller elects to enforce this agreement. D canceled the agreement. P sold the
property to a third party for $19,000. P sued for damages of $3,141.44. The trial court
ruled that the liquidated damages clause was valid and enforceable and that P was entitled
to the $200 and no more. D got the summary judgment. The court of appeals reversed. D
appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment