MATTER OF ANDREW R.
454 N.Y.S.2d 820 (1982)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over placement of a minor in foster care.
FACTS: Andrew's (D) father filed a petition with the court alleging that his son was a
Person in Need of Supervision (PINS) claiming that D was beyond the lawful control of his
parents. The father alleged that D threatened him with a knife and damaged household
property. The petition alleged that D had been voluntarily placed in the Hawthorne Cedar
Knoll, a residential treatment center under a voluntary placement instrument. The petition
also alleged that D truanted from school for over two years and truanted while in placement.
During the August, 1982 hearing D's father's counsel tried to elicit additional testimony
about alleged misconduct other that what was listed in the petition and D's guardian
objected as a matter of statutory and constitutional law. The trial court sustained the
objection; as such, a cause of action requires specific allegations. The father testified
that D voluntarily agreed to placement in the Knolls location. D disputed that contention
and claimed that he was tricked into going to the home and in August ran away from that home
and refused to return. D maintained that the placement was voluntary and authorized under
Social Services Law Sec. 384-a; a voluntary placement instrument.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment