MATTER OF ESTATE OF VADNEY
83 N.Y.2d 885, 612 N.Y.S.2d 375, 634 N.E.2d 976 (1994)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action to reform a deed. Appealed. Children of decedent
sought review of an order, which reversed a decree of the surrogate's court dismissing
petitioner decedent's son's petition to determine the validity, construction, and effect of
a deed executed by decedent.
FACTS: Decedent conveyed real property to herself and one of her sons (P). The deed did
not describe the type of tenancy created, and did not contain survivorship language. After
decedent's death, P, as executor of decedent's estate excluded the property from the
estate's assets under the assumption that the deed created a joint tenancy with a right of
survivorship in him. Decedent's other children (D) argue that the deed created a tenancy in
common. P sued for a reformation of the deed, claiming that a joint tenancy was intended,
but the language creating it expressly was omitted due to scrivener's error. The lower court
refused to admit extrinsic evidence and dismissed the petition. The Appellate Division
reversed and granted the petition. D appeals.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment