McNULTY V. CUSACK
104 So.2d 785 (1958)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a final judgment in a negligence action.
FACTS: Cusack (P) sued McNulty (D) as a result of a rear end collision between their
respective cars. D's car ran into P's car at an intersection. P testified at trial that she
was stopped at a red light and waiting for it to change when D's car came up from behind and
crashed into her car. D then rushed up to P and apologized to her and when she stated to him
that he had wrecked her car, he remarked that that could be fixed. The jury returned a
verdict for P for $16,000.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment