MOZES V. MOZES
239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal by Mozes (H) from an adverse decision under The
Hague Convention.
FACTS: H and W are Israeli citizens. They agreed to have W take their children to Los
Angeles because both parents agreed that the children would profit from a chance to attend
school here, learn English and partake of American culture. W moved with the children to
Beverly Hills, where she leased a home, purchased automobiles and enrolled the children in
school. H remained in Israel, but he paid for both the house and the automobiles used by his
family, and stayed with them at the house during his visits to Los Angeles. They agreed to
stay for 15 months. A year after they arrived in the United States, W filed an action
seeking dissolution of the marriage and custody of the children. The court granted temporary
custody to W and entered a temporary restraining order enjoining H from removing the
children from southern California. H filed a petition in federal district court, seeking to
have the children returned to Israel under The Hague Convention. H now appeals the district
court's denial of his petition with regard to the three younger children.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment