NESSRALLA V. PECK
532 N.E.2d 685 (1989)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a suit for specific performance of an oral contract to
convey land.
FACTS: Nessralla (P) owned a farm. Peck (D), was P's son in law. D asked P to act as a
straw to assist in the acquisition of a farm across the street from P's farm. In return D
agreed to act as a straw to assist P in acquiring the farm adjacent to his. P had a dispute
with that farm and figured that its owner would not want to deal with him. P purchased the
farm that D wanted putting up $11,000 of his own money and taking title. D's firm then
reimbursed P and paid the entire purchase price of $162,500. P then turned his attention to
acquiring the farm he wanted and D assured P that he was using his best efforts to purchase
that property. D eventually purchased the adjacent farm and D took title in his name and
that of his cousin, Lily Bentas as tenants in common. P did not participate in that purchase
and learned one month later that D had actually consummated the deal. P requested that D
sell the farm to him. D failed to respond. P sued D for specific performance.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment