NOLAN V. STATE
213 Md. 298, 131 A.2d 851 (1957)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Nolan (D) challenged a judgment of the Circuit Court convicting him
of embezzlement and sentencing him accordingly.
FACTS: D was manager of Federal Discount Corporation's D.C. office. D was responsible for
everything that went on in the office. He opened all the mail, looked at the money and
checks, passed on loans, and received payments in the office. D was bonded. There were two
employees. D recommended that Mrs. Biggs be employed. She was a cashier. She entered the
payments, made out daily report sheets and balanced out those sheets. D quit his job on
November 2, 1952, when he was instructed not to take business from an automobile dealer
named Metcalf. Mrs. Biggs quit the same day. An accountant, was called in to audit the books
the same day. Shortages were discovered. D came up with a scheme that after Mrs. Briggs
balanced her cash drawer he would go over the sheets with her. D would tell her to take out
of the cash an odd amount, such as $251.24, an amount that could not be checked back through
the receipts to pinpoint specific accounts. She would then rerun the tape to show the short
additions so, when the daily report sheets were prepared, she would show a total which would
not agree with the total amount actually received or the correct total of the items shown on
the sheets, but only the amount that would go into the bank account. The cash that was not
deposited in the bank would be taken by D and put in his pocket. Deposits for each day were
short totaled. Mrs. Briggs knew what she and D were doing was wrong. D kept part of the
money and Mrs. Briggs was also given money by D. If anything was left, it was kept in the
top drawer of a desk in her apartment. There was between $25,000.00 and $30,000.00 in that
desk drawer. D took the money from her desk drawer and told her he had buried it in the
basement of his home. She purchased a 1951 Cadillac for herself in February, 1952, for about
$3,000.00. She bought another Cadillac in September, 1952, in Philadelphia, in the presence
of D, for about $5,300.00 in cash, which Nolan paid for. The certificate of title was made
out to her and later put in their joint names. She also purchased a mink coat in Washington
for $5,500.00, plus tax. Eventually the scheme was discovered. D was convicted of
embezzlement and appealed. Ds had actually been tried in the District of Columbia and Mrs.
Briggs was acquitted of a charge of embezzlement and D's case was disposed on a directed
verdict. D contends that, even assuming there was adequate corroboration of Mrs. Biggs'
testimony, the evidence produced made the crime larceny and not embezzlement, as charged in
the indictment.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment