PEOPLE V. ENSKAT
20 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 98 Cal.Rptr. 646 (1971)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a prosecution for exhibiting obscene pictures.
FACTS: In connection with Enskat's (D) arrest, the police entered his theater and took
photographs of portions of a motion picture. The film itself was not seized under a warrant
or otherwise introduced into evidence. The photographs of the film, along with photographs
of the exterior of the theater, were put in evidence. The balance of the film was the
subject of testimony. D objected, invoking the best evidence rule. The objection was
overruled. D was convicted and appeals.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment