PEOPLE V. GARDELEY
927 P.2d 713 (1996)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, robbery
and increased sentence trial based on gang activity.
FACTS: Bruno decided to urinate in a car port of an apartment complex which was in an
area controlled by the Family Crip gang. Bruno was confronted by three gang members (Ds) who
then proceeded to beat Bruno severely and to steal a watch, a gold chain and $30. The police
were called and eventually Ds were found with a baggie of cocaine outside the car they were
driving and Ds with blood and bruises on their bodies from a recent fight. Ds, Gardeley and
Thompson were charged with attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, robbery and
increased sentence liability based on the fact that the activities they engaged in were done
for and related to gang activity. During trial, a police detective was brought to the stand
to establish the gang activity of the Ds and when asked to relay the evidence of the third
D, Watkins, the defense objected. An offer of proof was made without the jury present and
the trial court ruled that the detective could testify as an expert on criminal gang
activity. Watkin's testimony was allowed but with a jury charge of its use in forming an
expert opinion. More evidence and bad acts of the gang were entered into evidence by the use
of the expert detective such that eventually that detective concluded that Ds were acting
within the requirements for enhanced sentencing under STEP. Ds were convicted and appealed.
The Appeals court struck the enhanced sentences for the gang activity in that the
prosecution failed to prove two or more predicate offenses as required under the enhanced
sentencing act (STEP).
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment