PEOPLE V. MOUNTAIN
486 N.E. 2d 802 (1985)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the admissibility of evidence about blood
type.
FACTS: Apparently, Mountain (D) was convicted of some criminal conduct where he left his
sperm and evidence regarding his blood type was allowed into evidence. The trial court
allowed the evidence in despite objections by D. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment