PETERS V. ARCHAMBAULT
278 N.E.2d 729 (1972)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Archambault (D) appealed an order, which ordered the removal of a
portion of their home that encroached on the land of Peters (P).
FACTS: Archambault (D) owned a house that was built partially on P's lot. D was innocent
of any wrongdoing other than not discovering the problem prior to his acquisition of the
title from his predecessor. Both lots were registered. The encroachment was discovered just
twenty years after it was made. The trial judge ordered the encroachment removed. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment