PRO-FOOTBALL, INC. V. HARJO 565 F.3d 880 (D.C. Cir. 2009) CASE BRIEF

PRO-FOOTBALL, INC. V. HARJO

565 F.3d 880 (D.C. Cir. 2009)

NATURE OF THE CASE: On remand, the district court reconsidered the evidence and again ruled for D. Harjo (P) appealed.

FACTS: See Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo 415 F.3d 44 (D.C. Cir. 2005) for the facts. On remand the district court again found the defense of laches persuasive. It held that the seven-year, nine-month 'Romero Delay Period' evinced a lack of diligence on Romero's part. P appealed.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner