R. V. MALOTT
    
      1998 WL 1714234 Supreme Court of Canada
    
      NATURE OF THE CASE: Malott (D) was charged with first degree murder in shooting of common 
      law spouse who had abused her physically, sexually, psychologically and emotionally over the 
      course of their 20-year relationship. The defense at trial was self-defense, and D relied on 
      battered woman's syndrome. D was convicted and appealed on the basis of the jury 
      instructions regarding self-defense. 
    
      FACTS: D and the deceased had lived as common law spouses for almost 20 years. The 
      deceased abused D physically, sexually, psychologically and emotionally. A few months before 
      the shooting, the deceased separated from D, took their son and went to live with his 
      girlfriend. On the day of the shooting D was scheduled to go to a medical centre with the 
      deceased to get prescription drugs for use in his illegal drug trade. D took a pistol from 
      the gun cabinet. After driving to the medical centre, she shot him to death. She then took a 
      taxi to the girlfriend's home, shot her and stabbed her with a knife. D was charged with 
      first degree murder and attempted murder. At trial, the accused testified to the extensive 
      abuse which she had suffered and led expert evidence to show that she suffered from battered 
      woman syndrome. The jury found her guilty of second degree murder in the death of the 
      deceased and of attempted murder of his girlfriend. A majority of the Court of Appeal 
      affirmed the convictions. It found that there was no air of reality to the defense of 
      self-defense as it related to the charge of attempted murder. With respect to the deceased, 
      the court concluded the jury was clearly instructed that the perception of the accused 
      developed against the background of her abuse, was required to be assessed in determining if 
      her actions were reasonable self-defense. The accused appealed from the murder conviction 
      complaining about the adequacy of the trial judge's charge to the jury on the murder charge 
      with regard to the issue of battered woman syndrome as a defense.
    
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get 
      free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples 
      of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment