RANKIN V. RANKIN
124 A.2d 639 (1956)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a divorce based on cruelty and desertion.
FACTS: W and H were not a model of marital bliss and for the most part did not get along
well with one another. They called each other names, lied about the events of their lives
together and for the most part hated each other. H even accused W of attempting to kill him
by running him over with their car that he escaped from by turning the ignition off. There
was basically no corroborating evidence or sufficient evidence to show just who was the evil
spouse in all their goings on H sought and was granted a divorce on grounds of adultery. W
defaulted. The lower court granted the divorce. W seeks to set aside the default alleging
that she never committed adultery and only agreed to the story because H promised if she
did, she would get custody of the children.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment