REGINA V. FEELY
2 W.L.R. 201 (1973)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a conviction of theft.
FACTS: Feely (D) was a branch manager for bookmakers. In September, 1971 the firm sent a
circular to all branch managers to stop employee borrowing from the tills. D took 30 pounds
from the safe on October 4th and that was discovered when D was transferred to another
branch. D gave an IOU for the amount intending to pay back the shortage. D made a written
statement at a police station that he had borrowed about 30 and intended paying it back,
that his employers owed him about 70, from which he wanted them to deduct the money which
he had taken. D was charged under the Theft Act 1968 with the theft of 29.89. The trial
judge directed the jury that if the defendant had taken the money it was no defense for him
to say that he had intended to repay it and that his employers owed him enough to cover what
he had taken. D was convicted and appealed. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment