RUMBAUGH V. McCORMICK
88 N.E. 410 (1909)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute about the damage a sheep dog did.
FACTS: Ps, McCormick and Blair filed separate actions against Rumbaugh (D) for injuries
alleged inflicted upon their respective sheep by a dog owned by D. Each Plaintiff recovered
a judgment and D appealed based on evidence admitted to show the propensity of his dog to
attack sheep.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
You are contributing to Global legal knowledge acquisition. You intend to disclose the law. Why not do a full disclosure to adequately facilitate the learning of the law? Please do more than what you are doing now, by providing information on the rule of law, the holding and decisions of the courts, as well as the legal analysis. Thanks for the opportunity.
ReplyDelete