SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC. V. MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD
502 U.S. 105 (1991)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Simon (P) signed an agreement with an author who had contracted with
admitted organized crime figure Henry Hill for the production of a book about Hill's life.
Upon discovery it was determined that P had violated the Son of Sam law. P sued under 42
U.S.C. 1983, seeking a declaration that the law violates the First Amendment and an
injunction barring the law's enforcement. The District Court found the law to be consistent
with the Amendment, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.
FACTS: New York passed a law that prohibited criminals from taking advantage of their
notoriety to profit from their crimes. The statute was intended to ensure that monies
received by the criminal under such circumstances shall first be made available to
recompense the victims of that crime for their loss and suffering. The law eventually
required that any entity contracting with an accused or convicted person for a depiction of
the crime to submit a copy of the contract to respondent Crime Victims Board, and to turn
over any income under that contract to the Board. The Board is then required to deposit the
payment in an escrow account for the benefit of and payable to any victim. After five years,
if no actions are pending, 'the board shall immediately pay over any moneys in the escrow
account to such person or his legal representatives.' A person who has never been accused or
convicted of a crime in the ordinary sense, but who admits in a book or other work to having
committed a crime, is within the statute's coverage. David Berkowitz, the person who
provoked the law, was found incompetent to stand trial, and the statute at that time applied
only to criminals who had actually been convicted. Berkowitz voluntarily paid his share of
the royalties from the book Son of Sam, published in 1981, to his victims or their estates.
This case began in 1986, when the Board first became aware of the contract between
petitioner Simon & Schuster and admitted organized crime figure Henry Hill. Hill admitted to
a large number of crimes in his book. Hill and another named Pileggi wrote Wiseguy, which
was published in January 1986. Within 19 months of its publication, more than a million
copies were in print. A few years later, the book was converted into a film called
Goodfellas, which won a host of awards as the best film of 1990. The Board notified Simon &
Schuster and ordered Simon & Schuster to furnish copies of any contracts it had entered into
with Hill, to provide the dollar amounts and dates of all payments it had made to Hill, and
to suspend all payments to Hill in the future. Simon & Schuster complied with this order.
The Board also ordered Hill to turn over the payments he had already received, and ordered
Simon & Schuster to turn over all money payable to Hill at the time or in the future. Simon
& Schuster brought suit in August 1987, under 42 U.S.C. 1983, seeking a declaration that
the Son of Sam law violates the First Amendment and an injunction barring the statute's
enforcement. The District Court found the statute consistent with the First Amendment. A
divided Court of Appeals affirmed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment