STATE V. FAVORS
92 Ariz. 147, 375 P.2d 260 (1962)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a conviction for robbery.
FACTS: Favors (D) entered Weylor's property and robbed him. D was charged and tried for
robbery. The prosecution did not establish that the crime had been committed in the county
where D was being tried. After D had finished his closing arguments, he asked the court to
instruct the jury that there had been no evidence that the crime was committed in the county
in which it was being tried. D asked for a dismissal of the case. The prosecution moved to
reopen the case to prove that the venue was proper. The judge granted the prosecution
request. D was convicted. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment