STATE V. GLADSTONE
78 Wash. 2d 306, 474 P.2d 274 (1970)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Gladstone (D) appealed his conviction for aiding and abetting a
seller of marijuana.
FACTS: Gladstone (D) was a student at the University of Puget Sound. D had a conversation
with Douglas Thompson concerning the possible purchase of marijuana from Robert Kent. All of
the parties were students at the University. Thompson was an undercover student narc hired
by the local police. When asked about buying marijuana, by Thompson, D replied that he did
not have enough but told him about Kent. D gave Thompson, Kent's address and drew a map to
Kent's residence. Testimony of the brief conversation and D's very crude drawing consisting
of 8 penciled lines indicating where Kent lived constitute the whole proof of the aiding and
abetting presented. Thompson went there and bought marijuana. D was tried and convicted for
aiding and abetting. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment