STATE V. HAYES
105 Mo. 76, 16 S.W. 514 (1891)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Hayes (D) appealed his conviction for burglary and larceny.
FACTS: Hayes (D) proposed to Hill that Hill join him in the burglary of a general store.
Hill was a relative of the owner and feigned acquiescence in the scheme in order to arrest
D. On that night, D raised the window and assisted Hill in climbing through the window. Hill
then handed out a slab of bacon and D was arrested. At trial, the trial court issued
instructions that D would be guilty of the burglary if he, with felonious intent, assisted
and aided Hill to enter the building notwithstanding the fact that Hill may have had such an
intent. D was convicted and appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment