STATE V. LARSON 582 N.W.2d 15 (1997) CASE BRIEF

STATE V. LARSON

582 N.W.2d 15 (1997)

NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a conviction of manslaughter. Larson (D) appeals the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal.

FACTS: D was driving in a construction zone anywhere from 62-68 mph. The posted limit was 75 but it was recommended that 55 be maintained through the construction zone. Suddenly, D's Ford Explorer in a split second crossed the center line and drove into the closed lane, hit two people and killed them. D was convicted of second degree manslaughter under a statute that defined the crime as the reckless killing of another. After the accident D claimed that he did not know what happened and had not even realized he hit a second worker until after the accident had occurred. There was no evidence as to what caused D to drift out of his lane and there was no evidence of a pattern of erratic behavior or that D was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. D appealed; there was insufficient evidence of 'recklessness' to support the convictions because his conduct did not rise above mere negligence or inadvertence, and therefore, the trial court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner