STATE V. TUTTLE
650 N.W.2d 20 (2002)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Tuttle (D) was convicted of aggravated assault. D appealed.
FACTS: D had been drinking and decided with a friend, Emehezian, to drive to D's
grandmother's mobile home. After they arrived D and Emehezian got into an argument. A
shoving match ensued. Various residents of the trailer court came out to watch. One of them
succeeded in separating the two, whereupon Emehezian got into his car and sped away. D
chased him on foot as far as the entrance and then walked back to his grandmother's home.
Police arrived to investigate. D's grandmother approached the officers and requested that
they eject some people she did not want in her home. The officers found Terrance Yellow
Earrings, leaning against the kitchen sink, bleeding profusely. There was a recently washed
paring knife in the sink. In addition to Yellow Earrings and D's grandmother, the officers
found three other people in the trailer: D's mother (the girlfriend of Yellow Earrings), and
D's two uncles. D was outside the trailer, leaning up against a vehicle, when the officers
arrived. After Yellow Earrings received first aid from the officers, he was taken by
ambulance to the hospital. A medical examination revealed that he had sustained eleven stab
wounds. No one was talking so the police took them all, as well as D, in for questioning. D
admitted to having stabbed Yellow Earrings three times. D was charged with aggravated
assault. D moved to suppress statements he made during his interrogation on the grounds that
(a) he did not waive his Miranda rights, and (b) his admissions were involuntary. D had been
consuming alcoholic beverages. The circuit court denied his motion. Yellow Earrings was the
only eyewitness who testified on the identity of his assailant. No one else present during
the assault appeared as witnesses. During the course of his testimony, it emerged that
Yellow Earrings was, at the time of trial, incarcerated on a charge of tampering with a
witness involved in this case. The paring knife was admitted into evidence, over defense
objection. The jury found D guilty. The court sentenced him to six years in the
penitentiary, noting that this relatively light punishment was appropriate to Tuttle's age
(eighteen) and his prospects of rehabilitation. D moved for a new trial, arguing that fresh
evidence had arisen, namely that D's mother, Carol, had assaulted Yellow Earrings and had
inflicted stab wounds once before and once after the assault here in question. That motion
was denied. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment