SUBRAMANIAM V. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
100 Solicitor's Journal 566 (1956)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is an appeal from a conviction for unlawful possession of
ammunition.
FACTS: Subramaniam (D) was wounded by security forces. They searched him and discovered
20 rounds of ammunition on him. He was tried on a charge of being in possession of
ammunition without lawful authority. His defense was that he had been captured by terrorists
and was acting under duress. At trial, D attempted to present evidence of certain things the
terrorists had said to him. The trial judge ruled the statements inadmissible. D was
convicted and appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment