UNITED STATES V. HADLOCK
2010 WL 331772 (2010)
NATURE OF THE CASE: United States (P) moved for summary judgment as to whether Hadlock
(D) violated the Fair Housing Act, and under 28 U.S.C. 1367(a) for supplemental
jurisdiction of state law claims.
FACTS: D owns at least three single-family dwellings that she has rented to various
individuals over the past several years. On June 7, 2007, Ms. Jennifer Johnson Stevens
contacted d and inquired about one of her recently advertised rentals. D asked Ms. Stevens
if she had any children and further told her that she was not renting to anyone with
children. Shortly after this conversation, Ms. Stevens contacted the Fair Housing Council of
Oregon ('FHCO') because she was concerned that D was discriminating against renters with
children. The FHCO conducted testing of d's practices from July 26 through July 28, 2007, to
determine if violations of the FHAA had occurred or were occurring. P discovered evidence
that D had a long-standing practice of refusing to rent to families with children. D told
prospective renters that she did not want children in her homes.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment