UNITED STATES V. LYONS 731 F.2d 243, 739 F.2d 994 (1984) CASE BRIEF

UNITED STATES V. LYONS

731 F.2d 243, 739 F.2d 994 (1984)

NATURE OF THE CASE: The court reheard en banc its decision which overruled a judgment from the United States District Court and ruled that it was the jury's duty to determine whether Lyons' (D) involuntary narcotics addiction rendered him insane and thus availed him of an insanity defense to narcotics convictions.

FACTS: D was indicted on twelve counts of knowingly and intentionally securing controlled narcotics by misrepresentation, fraud, deception and subterfuge. D informed P that he intended to rely on a defense of insanity: that he had lacked substantial capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law because of drug addiction. In 1978 he began to suffer from several painful ailments and various narcotics were prescribed to be taken as needed for his pain, and that he became addicted to these drugs. He also offered to present expert witnesses who would testify that his drug addiction affected his brain both physiologically and psychologically and that as a result he lacked substantial capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law. From P's motion in limine, the district court excluded any evidence of D's drug addiction, apparently on the ground that such an addiction could not constitute a mental disease or defect sufficient to support an insanity defense. A panel of the Court reversed, holding that it was the jury's responsibility to decide whether involuntary drug addiction could constitute a mental disease or defect depriving D of substantial capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law. The case was heard en banc.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner