UNITED STATES V. OWENS
    
      21 M.J. 117 (1985)
    
      NATURE OF THE CASE: Owens (D) challenged the judgment where he was convicted by a general 
      court-martial for intentionally murdering his wife.
    
      FACTS: Owens (D) was on trial for the unpremeditated murder of his wife. D claimed that 
      he shot his wife in a tragic accident while examining his hunting rifle. P claimed that D 
      shot and killed his wife pursuant to a domestic dispute. At trial, the prosecutor questioned 
      D about three criminal convictions which he failed to mention on his application for 
      appointment as a Warrant Officer: one of these was for marijuana possession; one was for 
      assault and battery on his second wife; and the third for carrying a firearm without a 
      permit. D denied that he had been convicted of any of these offenses. On examination by 
      defense counsel, D admitted to the marijuana and firearms offenses, claiming that he had 
      told the personnel specialists who had processed his application about these offenses, and 
      relied on them to properly handle them. He made no admission about the assault and battery 
      offense. Prior to deliberation, the judge gave an instruction that the evidence had been 
      admitted for the purpose of assessing the credibility of D, insofar as he had failed to put 
      them on his Warrant Officer application.
    
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get 
      free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples 
      of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment