UNITED STATES V. OWENS
21 M.J. 117 (1985)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Owens (D) challenged the judgment where he was convicted by a general
court-martial for intentionally murdering his wife.
FACTS: Owens (D) was on trial for the unpremeditated murder of his wife. D claimed that
he shot his wife in a tragic accident while examining his hunting rifle. P claimed that D
shot and killed his wife pursuant to a domestic dispute. At trial, the prosecutor questioned
D about three criminal convictions which he failed to mention on his application for
appointment as a Warrant Officer: one of these was for marijuana possession; one was for
assault and battery on his second wife; and the third for carrying a firearm without a
permit. D denied that he had been convicted of any of these offenses. On examination by
defense counsel, D admitted to the marijuana and firearms offenses, claiming that he had
told the personnel specialists who had processed his application about these offenses, and
relied on them to properly handle them. He made no admission about the assault and battery
offense. Prior to deliberation, the judge gave an instruction that the evidence had been
admitted for the purpose of assessing the credibility of D, insofar as he had failed to put
them on his Warrant Officer application.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment