VIGIL V. HABER
888 P.2d 455 (1994)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over an engagement ring.
FACTS: Haber (H) and Vigil (W) exchanged engagement rings. Their relationship quickly
deteriorated and got very physical. The couple separated and W filed for a protective order.
The protective order was issued and the parties were ordered to return the engagement rings
they had given to each other. W objected to returning her ring. The police were instructed
to hold the ring until the matter was settled. H filed a motion in district court to have
the ring given to him. The court found that W had cancelled the wedding but that was based
on H's misconduct and then ordered that W could keep the ring. H appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment