WELSH V. WISCONSIN
466 U.S. 740 (1984)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is an appeal from a state misdemeanor conviction.
FACTS: A witness saw a car being driven erratically and eventually swerve off of a road
and into an open field. The witness was worried for the safety of the occupant and for the
safety of others should the driver decide to resume driving on the road. The witness
approached the driver, Welsh (D), and told him to remain with the vehicle until help arrived
(he had already called the police regarding what he saw). D simply walked away from the
scene. Police arrived and the witness told them what he had seen, and the police searched
the car for registration to determine who the driver could have been. The registration
revealed that it was D, and that his home was close by. Officers went to the home, and when
one of D's family members answered the door, the officers entered and, finding D, arrested
him for driving a motor vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant. The state trial court
never decided whether there was consent to the entry because it deemed decision of that
issue unnecessary in light of its finding that exigent circumstances justified the
warrantless arrest. D was found guilty. After reversing the lower court's finding of exigent
circumstances, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals remanded for full consideration of the consent
issue. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the trial
court's judgment. D was convicted and appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment