WETHERBEE V. GREEN
22 Mich. 311, 7 Am.Rep. 653 (1871)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action in replevin. Appealed. Wetherbee (D),
manufacturer, challenged the judgment that entered the jury's verdict in favor of Green (P),
landowner and creditors, in their action of replevin for hoops that were manufactured from
the timber sold by the tenant in common.
FACTS: Wetherbee (D) took timber from Green's (P) land, and made it into hoops. P sued
for replevin and won. D appealed, claiming that P could not replevy the hoops because D took
the timber in good faith, since he did so with permission of another whom he believed had
authority to give permission, and because, through his own efforts, he had converted the
timber into chattel much more valuable than the timber.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment