YOUNG V. HECTOR
1998 WL 329401 (Fla. App. 1998)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a custody award.
FACTS: An architect (H) married an attorney (W) and had two daughters. H was very
successful until the stock market crash of 1987. W moved up the litigation ladder and became
a well-paid successful litigation attorney at a major Miami firm. H moved down the ladder
and since the stock market, crash remained unemployed. Eventually the parties divorced and
dispute arose over the matter of custody. Evidence was presented on the life-style of W and
H and their interactions with the children. W was recommended for custody by the guardian ad
litem in that W was more economically stable, a more constant factor in the relations with
the children, and controls her anger better. H presented a large amount of evidence that he
was intimately involved with the children and their lives. The trial court gave custody to W
and H appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment