ZUMMO V. ZUMMO
574 A.2d 1130 (1990)
NATURE OF THE CASE: David Zummo (H) challenged an order which prohibited H from taking
his children to religious services contrary to the Jewish faith during periods of lawful
custody or visitation. H argued that the trial court erred in relying on an oral prenuptial
agreement, and that the order violated his constitutional rights and constituted an abuse of
discretion.
FACTS: H and W mere married and divorced. Three children were born of this marriage,
namely Adam, age eight; Rachael, age four; and Daniel, age three. W was raised a Jew and has
actively practiced her faith since childhood. H was raised Roman Catholic but had attended
Catholic services only sporadically. Prior to their marriage, they agreed that any children
would be raised in the Jewish faith. During the marriage, the Zummo family participated
fully in the life of the Jewish faith and community. W filed a divorce complaint on July 6,
1987, which included a count seeking confirmation of her custody of the children. The
parties have since agreed to share legal custody. They have also agreed that W should have
primary physical custody subject to H's partial physical custody on alternating weekends, as
well as certain holidays and vacation periods. In the court order H was obligated during his
weekend visitations to arrange for the children's attendance at their Synagogue's Sunday
School. H was not permitted to take the children to religious services contrary to the
Jewish faith. H appealed this Order to the Superior Court, asserting that his Constitutional
rights and those of his children were violated by the Order.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment