BATES V. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC 544 U.S. 431 (2005) CASE BRIEF

BATES V. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC

544 U.S. 431 (2005)

NATURE OF THE CASE: Bates (P) appealed a summary judgment that state law with respect to certain products was preempted by 7 U.S.C. 136v(b).

FACTS: Bates (P) are 29 Texas peanut farmers who allege that in the 2000 growing season their crops were severely damaged by the application of Dow's (D) pesticide named 'Strongarm.' The EPA conditionally registered Strongarm on March 8, 2000. According to Ps, D knew, or should have known, that Strongarm would stunt the growth of peanuts in soils with pH levels of 7.0 or greater. When Ps applied Strongarm on their farms - whose soils have pH levels of 7.2 or higher, as is typical in western Texas - the pesticide severely damaged their peanut crops while failing to control the growth of weeds. After unsuccessful negotiations Ps gave D notice of their intent to bring suit as required by the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act. D filed a declaratory judgment action asserting that Ps' claims were expressly or impliedly pre-empted by FIFRA. Ps brought counterclaims, including tort claims sounding in strict liability and negligence. The Court granted D's motion for summary judgment, rejecting one claim on state-law grounds and dismissing the remainder as expressly pre-empted. The Court of Appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner