BAUMAN V. CRAWFORD 704 P.2d 1181 (Wash. 1985) CASE BRIEF

BAUMAN V. CRAWFORD

704 P.2d 1181 (Wash. 1985)

NATURE OF THE CASE: Bauman (P) by his guardian ad litems appealed a judgment in favor of Crawford (D) against the P's tort action for the personal injuries that P suffered in an accidental collision. P contested the reduction of his damages due to contributory negligence.

FACTS: P was riding his bike at 9:30 p.m. P was 14 years 4 months old at that time. D's car collided with the bike. The collision occurred after dark on a public street. P was riding his bicycle down a steep hill; as he reached the base of the hill, D turned left in front of P and the collision resulted. P's bicycle was equipped with reflectors, but had no headlight. Local codes required a headlight on a bicycle operated after dark. P suffered a broken lower leg which required three surgeries during the 6 weeks immediately following the accident. P sued D for damages. D alleged contributory negligence by petitioner as an affirmative defense. The trial court instructed the jury that violation of an ordinance is negligence per se. The court also instructed the jury that the standard of ordinary care for a child is the care that a reasonably careful child of the same age, intelligence, maturity, training and experience would exercise under similar circumstances. P got the verdict but it was reduced to $400 for the contributory negligence. P appealed. It was reversible error for the court to instruct on negligence per se because he is a minor.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner