CORVA V. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
108 A.D. 2d 631 (1985)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over an auto settlement.
FACTS: P was a passenger in an auto when it collided with a case owned by Sabia. P
retained a law firm. Sabia was insured by USAA and USAA retained a law firm. The matter was
settled for $15,000 because USAA's attorney represented that the policy limits were $15,000.
P seeks compensatory and punitive damages. Both USAA and the law firm cross complained
against P's law firm in that it was negligent in not verifying the policy limits. P's law
firm moved to dismiss these cross claims and the motion was granted. Ds appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment