FOJTIK V. CHARTER MED. CORP.
985 S.W.2d 625 (1999)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Fojtik (P) appealed a decision, which granted summary judgment in
favor of Charter (D) in P's suit alleging false imprisonment.
FACTS: P's admission to D was preceded by an 'intervention.' D was confronted and told
him that he needed to go through an inpatient treatment at D for alcohol abuse. P was told
that if he did not voluntarily admit himself, they would have him committed to the hospital
and have him brought in wearing handcuffs. While at D, P made several requests for a 'pass'
permitting him to leave the facility. His initial requests were denied on the ground that he
was not 'eligible' for a pass until he was further into his stay. Later P was granted passes
for a few hours at a time, and always returned to D voluntarily and on time. P explained
that he had vowed to follow all of the rules at D only because he hoped that obedient
behavior might speed his release. P sued D for false imprisonment. Ds argued that P had
voluntarily admitted himself to its hospital, had been permitted to leave and had returned
voluntarily, and that the doors leading out of the hospital were never locked. D argued that
P's consent to his stay at D negated any possibility that he was detained without authority
of law. Ds moved for summary judgment and it was granted. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment