GASTON V. PARSONS 864 P.2d 1319 (1994) CASE BRIEF

GASTON V. PARSONS

864 P.2d 1319 (1994)

NATURE OF THE CASE: Gaston (P) brought a malpractice suit against Parsons (D), doctors and hospital, who were granted summary judgment because P failed to bring suit within the two-year statute of limitations. The Court of Appeals reversed, and Ds appealed.

FACTS: P was a partial quadriplegic whose only functioning limb was his left arm. P sought medical treatment from Ds for muscle spasms in his lower body. Before the surgery, D informed P about certain risks to the procedure, but not of any risk of possible loss of function in P's arm. Ds performed the procedure on March 12, 1987. P immediately noticed that his left arm was numb and did not function. D assured P that the loss of function in his left arm was temporary and that use of his arm would return in six months to two years. P did not recover. P filed this action on November 14, 1990, alleging negligence for failing to obtain P's informed consent before the surgery and in performing the surgery. Ds moved for summary judgment under the statute of limitations. The statute requires actions for claims arising from medical treatment to be 'commenced within two years from the date when the injury is first discovered or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been discovered. The trial court granted the motion and entered judgment for Ds. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the informed consent claim was barred, but that the negligent surgery claim was not barred because the statute of limitations did not start to run on that claim until P knew or should have known of Ds' negligence.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner