HERNANDEZ V. TOKAI CORPORATION
2 S.W.3d 251 (1999)
NATURE OF THE CASE: The Court of Appeals certified the question as to whether a
disposable butane lighter, intended only for adult use, could be found to be defectively
designed if it did not have a child-resistant mechanism.
FACTS: Emeterio bought disposable butane lighters for use at her bar. Her daughter,
Hernandez, took lighters from the bar from time to time for her personal use. They both knew
that it was dangerous for children to play with lighters. They also knew that some lighters
were made with child-resistant mechanisms, but Emeterio chose not to buy them. Hernandez's
five-year-old daughter, Daphne, took a lighter from her mother's purse on the top shelf of a
closet in a bedroom in her grandparents' home and started a fire in the room that severely
burned her two-year-old brother, Ruben. Hernandez (P) sued Tokai (D) under strict liability
and negligence; the lighter was defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous because it
did not have a child-resistant safety mechanism. Such mechanisms were available at nominal
cost. D moved for summary judgment in that the lighter is a simple household tool intended
for adult use only. There was no duty to protect unintended users from obvious and inherent
dangers. D also noted that adequate warnings were provided with its lighters, even though
that danger was obvious and commonly known. P argued that it was a decision for the jury to
decide under the risk utility test. The court granted summary judgment for D and P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment