LITTLEFIELD V. MCGUFFEY
954 F.2d 1337 (7th Cir.1992)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Littlefield (P) and McGuffey (D) both appealed a judgment in P's
action for intentional infliction of emotional distress and violations of the Equal
Opportunity in Housing provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Fair Housing Act.
FACTS: P met D at one of his apartment buildings. After viewing the advertised apartment,
she completed a rental application form and gave him a $280 check as a security deposit,
leaving the name of the payee blank at D's request. D and P had agreed she, her younger
sister Sandra, and her daughter Shaunte would occupy the two-bedroom apartment and that D
would purchase and install a carpet with P paying the cost of installation. D gave P a key
to the apartment, and between then and September 27 she, members of her family, and friends
cleaned and painted the apartment and moved various belongings into it. On September 27,
1988, Bruce Collins, accompanied by Shaunte, the two-year old daughter of Collins and P,
took a check to D to pay for the carpet installation. When D realized Mr. Collins was not
the same race as P but was the father of her daughter, he became quite agitated and
exclaimed 'the old man' had rented the apartment to someone else. After Collins left, D
called P at work and told her she could not rent the apartment because 'the boss' had rented
it to someone else. He also told her he had changed the locks and had put her belongings out
on the porch. That evening D called her at home, identified himself as Walley Luther, and,
mimicking a stereotypical black manner of speaking, told her he wanted to move in with her
and 'six black guys, . . . quit work and take welfare . . . and drugs with [her] . . . and
swap wives with Bruce.' He called her at least two more times that night and several other
times that week with similar, degrading messages. P's sister, Kathleen Gutierrez, was called
many times over the next week or so. D told her he was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and
regularly asked how her sister, Susanne, 'could have [gone] to bed with a nigger and how she
could . . . have a nigger baby.' On one occasion D attempted to lure Ms. Gutierrez outside
on the pretext that she had to move her car because the church lot where it was parked was
being caulked. In early November D tracked down P's new residence and left a note, written
on a napkin taped to her door, threatening the life of Bruce Collins and repeating racist
slurs. When she arrived home that evening, P found her sister, Sandra, hiding behind the
door, clutching a broom. P testified to all these events and more. P testified to numerous
episodes of severe emotional distress. She became hysterical upon receiving D's call at
work, went to the restroom, and cried; the rest of the day she suffered from stomach upset
and diarrhea. She experienced numerous episodes of disquiet and fright, being particularly
fretful because she feared for her daughter's safety. P also testified that when she came
home at night with Shaunte, she would run from her car to her apartment, clutching her
daughter in one arm, with her keys in one hand and a can of mace in the other. D denied the
allegations, claiming he had not refused her rental housing on the basis of race and that he
had not harassed her. He asserted, instead, he had learned from various businesses and prior
landlords that she was a poor credit risk and had a history as an undesirable tenant. He
presented no witnesses, however, that confirmed having given him the negative rental-history
or credit information. P presented witnesses from credit departments of various businesses D
claimed to have contacted. They generally testified the credit information D claimed to have
acquired would not be given out and that P's credit history was respectable. The testimony
of Brice Fawcett, P's former landlord contradicted everything D claimed. The jury found D
liable and awarded $50,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. D
appealed the judgment and the award of attorney's fees. P cross-appealed the denial of a fee
multiplier.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment