MCDONALD V. ROBINSON
224 N.W.2d 820 (1929)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Robinson (D) appealed a judgment in favor of McDonald (P) in P's
action at law to recover damages for personal injuries that resulted from the concurrent
negligence of the two drivers as joint tortfeasors.
FACTS: Robinson (D) was driving his car and Padzensky (D), was driving his car and when
near the center of an intersection, the automobiles collided, and as a result, became
interlocked. They were thrown out of their course. The Padzensky car struck P near the
corner of the curbing, knocked her down, and she was dragged under the car until it was
stopped, 56 feet farther north. After proceeding northward from the corner of the curbing,
the cars became separated, and the Robinson car was stopped on the opposite side of the
street. P's injuries were serious, and, she claims, permanent. P sued alleging that each car
was being negligently driven, and that the injury resulted from the concurrent negligence of
the two drivers. P got the verdict and D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment