MISSOURI V. ILLINOIS
200 U.S. 496 (1906)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is a suit brought by the state of Missouri (P) to restrain the
discharge of the sewage of Chicago through an artificial channel into the Desplaines river,
in the state of Illinois (D).
FACTS: P sought to restrain the discharge of the sewage of Chicago through an artificial
channel into the Desplaines river. That river empties into the Illinois river, and the
latter empties into the Mississippi at a point about 43 miles above the city of St. Louis.
It was alleged that the discharge would send 1,500 tons of poisonous filth daily into the
Mississippi. It was alleged that the defendant sanitary district was acting in pursuance of
a statute of the state of Illinois, and as an agency of that state. On a demurrer to the
motion for leave to file a bill of complaint, D argued that the Sanitary District was the
proper defendant and that D should not have been made a party. That argument was rejected. A
supplemental bill alleges that since the filing of the original bill the drainage canal has
been opened and put into operation, and has produced and is producing sewage. D alleges that
the new plan sends the water of the Illinois river into the Mississippi much purer than it
was before, that many towns and cities along the Missouri and Mississippi discharge their
sewage into those rivers, and that if there is any trouble P must look nearer home for the
cause. The only question presented was whether, as between the states of the Union, this
court was competent to deal with a situation which, if it arose between independent
sovereignties, might lead to war.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment