SEIGNEUR V. NATIONAL FITNESS INSTITUTE, INC.
752 A.2d 631 (2000)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Gerilynne Seigneur (P) husband and wife, appealed a judgment granting
National's (D) summary judgment motion, in a suit to determine whether the exculpatory
clause in D's participation agreement validly released D from all liability for injuries to
P caused by D's negligence.
FACTS: D operates an exercise and fitness facility. Ms. Seigneur (P) after deciding to
begin a weight loss and fitness program, joined D on a one-month trial basis. D promoted
itself as a fitness club that employed 'degreed, certified fitness, clinical exercise and
health specialists' and 'promised to provide programs that are appropriate for your health
status and fitness level.' D also promised to 'provide advice based upon scientific
evidence.' P had a history of serious lower back problems, including a herniated disc. Her
general physical condition was poor. P was required to complete and sign a document that
contained the following clause: Important Information: I, the undersigned applicant, agree
and understand that I must report any and all injuries immediately to NFI, Inc. staff. It is
further agreed that all exercises shall be undertaken by me at my sole risk and that NFI,
Inc. shall not be liable to me for any claims, demands, injuries, damages, actions, or
courses of action whatsoever, to my person or property arising out of or connecting with the
use of the services and facilities of NFI, Inc., by me, or to the premises of NFI, Inc.
Further, I do expressly hereby forever release and discharge NFI, Inc. from all claims,
demands, injuries, damages, actions, or courses of action, and from all acts of active or
passive negligence on the part of NFI, Inc., its servants, agents or employees. P signed and
an employee of D performed an initial evaluation. While attempting to lift a weight with her
arms, P felt a tearing or ripping sensation in her right shoulder. P reported this to D's
employee but it was ignored and the evaluation continued. After the incident, P claims she
has had pain and difficulty using her shoulder. P has undergone shoulder surgery for a
condition that her doctor attributed to the use of D's upper torso machine. Ps sued D. D
filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the exculpatory clause contained in the Participation
Agreement was valid and enforceable. D got summary judgment. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment