STELTER V. CHIQUITA PROCESSED FOODS, L.L.C.
658 N.W.2d 242 (2003)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Stelter (P) appealed a decision wherein the trial court refused to
give a res ipsa loquitur instruction to the jury on the issue of negligence.
FACTS: P sued Chiquita (D) for damages after he fell into a drainage gutter in D's
factory. The gutters were covered with steel safety grates that fit into grooves so that
they would lay flush with the floor. They were designed to support the weight of people
walking or standing on them. The evidence showed that D had exclusive control over the grate
and that the grate could not fall into the gutter if it had been properly set in place.
There is no evidence that the grate bent or broke or that P moved or lifted the grate. P had
glanced at the grate and 'it had the appearance of being okay.' He put the weight of one leg
on the grate, and it held up and did not move or wobble. When he placed his full weight on
the grate, and the grate over the top buckled down into the gutter, and P fell. The grate
slipped down into the gutter at an angle and his foot followed. He injured his leg in the
fall. The district court refused to instruct on res ipsa loquitur. The jury found neither
party negligent.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment