LONDONER V. DENVER
210 U.S. 373 (1908)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a challenge of tax against owners of land to pay for paving
a public street.
FACTS: Colorado statutes provided that the Board of Public Works, after notice and
opportunity to be heard, could order the paving of a street on petition of a majority of the
owners of the property fronting thereon. Before taking effect, such an order had to be
approved and implemented through adoption by the Denver City Council. After completion of
the work, the Board was to determine the total cost and then make an assessment on each
property fronting that street. This assessment was again required to be approved by the City
Council with notice and opportunity to be heard. Londoner (P) disapproved of his assessment
because a petition by the majority of the affected property owners had not been filed and
the council had not afforded a hearing on that issue, and the paving had not been completed,
the apportionment of costs was not proper, and the hearing procedures afforded by the
Council with respect to the assessment were inadequate. The Colorado courts rejected P's
challenge as the law stated that the improvement and assessment orders should be conclusive
and binding on the Colorado courts. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment