MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP. V. SOLER CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC.
723 F.2d 155, cert. granted 469 U.S. 916 (1st Cir. 1983)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the scope of an arbitration agreement.
FACTS: Mitsubishi initiated arbitration in a dispute with Soler claiming that Soler had breached its dealership agreement by failing to take delivery of 996 vehicles. Soler claimed antitrust violations and Mitsubishi brought a proceeding in District Court to compel arbitration. The court ordered arbitration of the antitrust defense and counterclaims. Soler appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment