EMPRO MFG. CO. V. BALL-CO MFG., INC.
870 F.2d 423 (1989)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the meaning of a letter of intent. Empro (P)
buyer appealed a decision that dismissed P's complaint against Ball (D) seller for failure
to state a claim on which relief may be granted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
FACTS: Ball (D) floated its assets on the market and Empro (P) showed interest. After
preliminary negotiations, P sent D a three-page letter of intent to purchase D for $2.4
million with $650,000 paid on closing and the rest on a 10-year promissory note secured by
the inventory of D. The letter conditioned P's purchase upon conditions precedent and the
approval of P's board of directors. The deal eventually fell through when D wanted a
security interest in the land under the plant, P refused. P then learned that D was
negotiating with someone else. P sued in diversity and for a temporary restraining order.
The trial judge dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment