INMAN V. CLYDE HALL DRILLING CO.
369 P.2d 498 (Alaska 1962)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a suit for damages under a 30-day provision in an employment
contract. Inman (P) sought review of an order granting summary judgment in favor of Clyde
(D), based upon a finding that P's action was barred due to his failure to comply with the
notice provision in the contract upon which his suit was based.
FACTS: Inman (P) contracted to work for Clyde Hall Drilling Co. (D). The employment
contract required P to give D 30 days notice for any claims arising from P's employment. D
fired P on March 24. P filed suit against D on April 5 for breach of contract. D was served
with P's complaint on April 14. D moved for a summary judgment; P failed to give written
notice of his claim. D's motion was granted. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment