SULLIVAN V. BULLOCK
864 P.2d 184 (1993)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a home remodeling contract.
FACTS: Sullivan (P) and Bullock (D) entered into a contract to remodel P's kitchen. The
work was not started on time but that was assented to. The work performed was not
workmanlike, and P did not convey this dissatisfaction to D. Extra costs incurred were not
approved by P and P refused D the opportunity to finish the job. D presented P with a final
bill of $2,956.40. P sued D for $19,703 to fix the poor work that D had done and P countered
for his bill. The jury found that D had not substantially performed but that he was
prevented from performing by P. The jury gave D the verdict on the bill. P moved for
judgment n.o.v. or a new trial. That was denied. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment