PYM V. CAMPBELL
6 Ellis & Blackburn 370 (1856)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the sale of shares in an invention.
FACTS: D agreed to purchase part of P's invention. When they met to discuss the
invention, the parties agreed for convenience sake to draw up an agreement for the sale of
the shares of the shares of the invention subject to approval of an engineer named
Abernethie. If Abernethie approved of the invention there would be an agreement and if not
there would be no agreement. Abernethie did not approve. P sued to enforce the agreement. D
contended there was no bargain and introduced parol evidence at trial to show that there was
no agreement. The trial court permitted the parol evidence and P appealed the verdict in
favor of D.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment